Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

4 Conversations with Filmmakers from the 2010 Tribeca Film Festival

, , , , , ,

| 14 comments

The 2010 Tribeca Film Festival marked a significant moment in the world of independent film: for the first time a selection of the festival's feature-length films were made available online at or around the same time as their world premieres.  Some of these titles, including Climate of Change, Road Movie, The Infidel, The Trotsky and sex & drugs & rock & roll are now available for rent in the YouTube Store. We asked some of the directors of these films about their festival experience, the future of movies in the age of digital, and the effect of distribution strategies on the creative process.

What was the inspiration for your film?
Brian Hill, director of Climate of Change
The inspiration for the film was a desire to move on from the kind of environmental films that had showcased the science of climate change and the perilous state the earth was in.  I’d seen and very much liked An Inconvenient Truth but felt that there was room for a film in which we heard from ordinary people around the world who were concerned about environmental matters and felt that they could offer something.  So in a sense the inspiration for the film was the belief that all of us can make a difference.
 
Jacob Tierney, director of The Trotsky
I always loved high school movies... and Leon Trotsky. My parents sent me to therapy to cure one of those things. It didn't work.
 
Josh Appignanesi, director of The Infidel
The Infidel, about a Muslim who finds out he was born a Jew, was inspired by a number of things - not least David Baddiel's (the writer's) experiences growing up. Of Jewish origin, he was beaten up on two spearate occassions: once for being thought Jewish, once for being thought Pakistani. Then there was Omid Djalili and his stand up - the first of the "2nd generation" standups to really mine the prejudices and presumptions of the post cold-war identity politics - east vs west, Muslim vs Christian, middle east vs Jewish and what have you - in an inclusive and enabling way.  There's something very warm and non-misanthropic about his humour and that was a necessity for our subject matter.  I too have a mixed background, actually a transatlantic one, hence an American Richard Schiff's character as the Jewish "buddy".  I loved the idea of colliding of a kind of 80s body-swap high-concept comedy idea with the most vexed politics of our era... There's low-status British comedy combining with American indie and screwball lineages, so with the form as well as the content I wanted to bring together different cultures. 
 
Dev Bengal, director of Road, Movie
I’ve always wanted to make a road movie. It’s a genre I love and one I thought was also so quintessentially Indian and at the same time universal too.
While I was at NYU I saw Preston Sturges' "Sullivans Travels" and loved every bit of it -- the writing, the humor and the theme in the movie which stayed with me for long. Sturges was also one of the first writer directors in Hollywood which was really inspiring. And then there’s the Travelling Cinemas of India. A truck with two film projectors and a box full of film travelling into the wild. It’s one half road and one half movie. Here was a film waiting to be made. I found of these cinemas and I called the young 24-year old man who was it and asked to meet him. I drove 6 hours outside Bombay to an open barren field, where I met him. I waited for him to set up the cinema but he seemed in no hurry. After a few more hours of waiting I began to think nothing was going to happen. I asked him, “what are you waiting for? Aren’t you going to set this up?” He shook his head and said he’d wait. “And what if no one comes,” I asked in despair. He shrugged his shoulders and said, “I’ll drive elsewhere.” I looked around. It was barren, deserted and empty. There was no chance in hell anyone was going to appear. I began to get restless and annoyed; I’d driven 6 hours out for nothing. It was a wasted trip. But something made me stay on. Till today I don’t know what it was. At around sunset I saw a few people in the horizon. The young man responded quickly. He  stretched a large bedsheet out which became a screen and set up the cinema. By 9pm there were 3,500 people who had gathered. I was speechless. He began screening movies through the night. At some point around 4am I fell asleep. When I woke few hours later there was no one in sight. Everyone had disappeared. There was not a trace of anyone. What I saw and went through was all so real and yet in the morning it felt like I’d been in a dream. And somewhere at that moment the film came to me.

Mat Whitecross, director of sex & drugs & rock & roll
The inspiration for the film came from Ian Dury's life and from his music - his family and friends were instrumental in communicating that to us. On top of that, we unearthed a huge amount of period research in the form of interviews and documentaries - and YouTube clips of Ian's performances and interviews were instrumental in me deciding to come on board the project at the start. Aside from that, there were a few films that we drew on - not directly - but that we could talk about as general influences; above all 8 1/2 and All That Jazz.
 
At what point in the process of making your film did you start thinking about your distribution strategy?  Did it have any affect on your creative process?
 
Brian Hill, director of Climate of Change
I don’t think I ever consciously thought that much about a distribution strategy.  What I did think about was how a film about the environment might impact people and draw in an audience and I thought that the best way to do that was to concentrate on the ordinary and everyday experiences of people.  So in terms of the creative process I wanted the film to be simple in structure and feature great characters.  And I was also, right from the start, determined to make a film that looked and sounded great.
 
Jacob Tierney, director of The Trotsky
Beyond securing Canadian distribution (which we need to get financing), all I really wanted was to make the best movie I could. I figured that would give me the best chance of getting my film seen.
 
Josh Appignanesi, director of The Infidel
We had to consider distribution from the start because even with a small indie movie in the UK you can't get finance up front if you don't have a distributor.  From the start there was a lot of distrust of whether the idea would work comedically or whether it would cause too much controversy, yet on the other hand there was great demand for the idea, from international pre-sales and just people responding to the script. You have to walk a line between something that's too cartoony, that has no teeth whatsoever, and something that is inclusive rather than exclusive or alienating, a kind of humor that is non-misanthropic rather than setting out to offend. Within that gentleness, we looked at the comic stereotypes we were using and tried extra hard to subvert them.  And actually the most subversive thing is perhaps simply presenting a family who happen to be Muslim but are essentially everymen, everypeople.  The son doesn't become a suicide bomber, the dad doesn't become a fundamentalist, they're just an ordinary rather flawed family, vaguely religious but not in any thought-out or political way. Muslim and Asian audiences have really embraced that - the normality of that.  We always talked about creating a "muslim Homer Simpson."
 
Dev Bengal, director of Road, Movie
I was fortunate to have an incredible studio, Studio 18, support me on this journey. They loved the script and believed in the film. I also had the most incredible sales company - Fortissimo come early on board. The screenplay was an official selection at Cannes in their Atelier du Cannes section. So the filming process was a relaxed one. But getting US distribution was a distant dream. When we heard about Tribeca Film taking my film - it was like that moment with the travelling cinema! It’s a historic moment for us- it’s been a long-long time since an Indian independent films has got US distribution.  
 
Mat Whitecross, director of sex & drugs & rock & roll, with producer, Damian Jones
We intentionally financed the film’s budget out of the UK as initially the subject matter  seemed to exclude international monies. Once film was complete and our UK release was underway, we obviously wanted to maximize its appeal globally and believe we had a universal story that was not dependent on any prior knowledge of the man or his music, focusing o the father / son relationships in the film. This had indeed been an early creative decision for the film to reach a wider audience, otherwise we might as well have made a niche documentary.
 
Can you tell us a bit about applying to festivals?  What advice would you have for a filmmaker who's getting ready to submit his/her film for festival consideration?
 
Brian Hill, director of Climate of Change
Climate of Change was actually rejected from a number of festivals before being accepted at Tribeca.  I think that’s because there is a certain kind of film that is seen as a “festival film,” a film that people in the industry like and want to promote.  What was great about Tribeca was a recognition that festivals can become inward looking and solipsistic and that to be really effective they should broaden their remit and attract a wider audience than industry professionals.  In other words, take the films to regular people.  So my advice would be to choose your festivals carefully.
 
Jacob Tierney, director of The Trotsky
There's not a lot to say about applying to festivals. Make sure you apply to the biggest and brightest first, because you don't want to end up premiering at a little festival, and have your film deemed ineligible to go to a major (festivals are getting more and more political, and more and more obsessed with "premieres").
 
Josh Appignanesi, director of The Infidel
Submit widely and don't take the knock-backs personally! 
 
Dev Bengal, director of Road, Movie
It's easy to be tempted by the big names. They are seductive and cool to be a part of. But one runs the risk of getting lost. I’d suggest looking at the smaller ones, the specialist ones. That’s where my first film was discovered. Your first public screening is a special moment and a nerve wracking one too. So choose a festival where your film will be cared for, loved by the team, understood and given the right platform to be seen and your voice as a filmmaker heard.
 
Mat Whitecross, director of sex & drugs & rock & roll, with producer, Damian Jones
Look at deadline applications and time the completion of your film to the most realistic both in one’s own domestic territory and in foreign markets. Look at criteria as festivals are strict on length.
 
What did you learn about your film watching it with an audience at the Tribeca Film Festival?
 
Brian Hill, director of Climate of Change
I learned that there is an appetite for documentary and that people want to watch films that don’t preach to them or patronize them.  My best experience at Tribeca was a screening we had for 500 New York schoolchildren.  They were enthusiastic and receptive and it made me realize that you can’t second guess an audience, you can’t really say for certain who will like your film or why they will like it.
 
Jacob Tierney, director of The Trotsky
That New Yorkers want more socialism!
 
Josh Appignanesi, director of The Infidel
Putting comedy in front of an audience is more brutal than any other genre: you know when it's working, and when it's not. I was curious to see how it would go down with a US audience - the cultural specificity of some of the gags - the different weighting of the terms Muslim and Jew here for example is a little different - but more importantly the overall sense of whether it entertains. The film mines a vein of humour which you could call American Jewish - hence Richard Schiff's character - and New York is a city that better than any other understands both the anxiety and the comedy that comes from groups of immigrants clashing. So I had high hopes. And if anything, the festival audience enjoyed it more whole heartedly than at home. Perhaps New Yorkers are just less repressed than Londoners. 
 
Dev Bengal, director of Road, Movie
It’s the best film school I could ever go to. The Tribeca audience taught me stuff no film could ever. It was like being in a Directing Master Class. Story, Story, Story. Pacing, Rhythm, Performance, Subtlety, Directness, the list is endless. That’s what I learned. The things that worked in my story and the bits that did not. What I could have done and what I should be doing for my next one.
 
Mat Whitecross, director of sex & drugs & rock & roll
We were 50% excited, 50% terrified about showing the film at Tribeca. Would people know about Ian's life? If not, did it matter? In the event, we had a fantastic mix of die-hard Blockhead fanatics, and new recruits to the cause. All of them embraced the film enthusiastically, which was such a relief. There's nothing like an NY audience to tell you what they really think of your film.
 
Where do you think independent cinema will be in 5 years?
 
Brian Hill, director of Climate of Change
I think independent cinema will be healthy in five years from now as long as it moves with the times and embraces new ways of reaching people.  In that respect, Tribeca is way ahead of the game compared with other festivals.
 
Jacob Tierney, director of The Trotsky
In 3-D. And blue.
 
Josh Appignanesi, director of The Infidel
I don't think anyone knows. The fear is that between 3D tentpoles in the studio system and internet piracy and alternate entertainments the indie sector will just be squeezed nearly out of existence. We'll see. I think there'll always be cineastes and creators who'll struggle to see their visions realised in this incredibly powerful medium; the question is how far they'll be able to go with what remains, despite the supposed benefits of 'digital', a very expensive medium. I wonder to what extent broadcasters and public service could come to play more of a role again. I'll be keeping my eyes open...  
 
Dev Bengal, director of Road, Movie
In five years, Indie cinema will have swamped everything else. Look at it now- in terms of numbers I think it beats everything else. I’m a never say die person. I don’t see the independent spirit disappearing - EVER. In fact,You Tube and other online forums are the new screens where new voices are born by the hour. There’s such incredible work being created here it’s jaw dropping. A few years ago no one would have ever imagined that something like this would exist.
 
Mat Whitecross, director of sex & drugs & rock & roll The optimist in me would like to think they'll be a new renaissance in indie cinema over the coming years, in the same way there was during the '80s and '90s. The internet and home cinema will open up a new audience to these movies and enable low-budget filmmakers to connect with them in a way that simply wasn't possible before. The new initiative by Tribeca and Amex - to proactively take festival films into viewers' homes - is at the forefront of that movement. I'm very excited about the future...




Meet the documentarian behind "Butterflies," a film about the YouTube community

, , , ,

| 10 comments

Ester Brym is the auteur behind "Butterflies," a documentary about the YouTube community and this brave new world of digital culture and social media. The film premiered at the Action on Film International Film Festival in Pasadena, CA, last summer and has since won the Alan J. Bailey Excellence Award in Documentary Filmmaking and was also nominated for Best Social Commentary. Now, it's available for rent on YouTube and will be featured on our homepage tomorrow.

1. How did you come up with the concept for "Butterflies"? Was it inspired by anyone in particular?
I was already a big fan of YouTube when I decided to make a documentary about its community. What fascinated me were mainly people's videos and the fact that one is able to reach anyone, anywhere, just by uploading a video online. When I realized that people actually have huge followings, I found it incredible. I worked with lots of independent filmmakers and figured that with YouTube's community, everybody now has a chance to have an audience. I was mainly interested in the people I was watching and very curious to know their story. At that time, it was Xgobobeanx, Paytotheorderofofof2, Thehill88, Brookers and others.

2. How did you go about choosing the subjects for your documentary?
Apart from Jill, aka Xgobobeanx, all the characters featured in "Butterflies" weren't my first choices. I filmed about 20 characters for over the period of one year. I picked the final six based on how their story developed and what happened to their YouTube channels. Some YouTubers weren't interested in being interviewed; some had to be cut out or added in because of how they all fit together to illustrate the community, the different personalities on YouTube and the kind of videos they make. I wanted to have a little bit of everything. I also wanted to acknowledge some of the original YouTube personalities so the film ends up having a good mixture of all, including DaveDays, Fred, Whatthebuckshow, LisaNova, Mr. Safety, Kicesie and Boheme.

3. With the cost of equipment falling so sharply, anyone can really make a documentary. What do you think separates average docs from good ones, and good ones from great ones?
It is true that anyone can make a documentary these days, and I am sure it is also thanks to the low costs that we were able to make and finish "Butterflies." I am asked very often how we raised money to make a feature film. I always answer the same way: anyone who has a great story and great people attached to a project can make a film. Of course, there are lots of technical issues, and film's production quality should be the best possible. For a great documentary you need to have great sound, good footage, and an amazing editor, but mainly you need to have a fantastic story that's interesting, fresh, new and different.

4. As you were making the film, how were you thinking about your distribution strategy? What were/are your goals for the film?
My original wish for the film never was traditional distribution. I felt the audience for this film is online and that's where we should present it. However, just a year ago, there still weren't many choices for us to put the film up online. This online distribution system is very new and still developing and it is very hard to distinguish a good distribution platform. As we searched, we ended up opening at film festivals and going through the traditional system because people were asking to see the film. This was very good for the movie as we got some awards, some recognition and people started to talk about "Butterflies." It comes at the perfect time, that YouTube launches its "for rent" program, because we couldn't imagine a more perfect and more fitting place for our movie.

5. Where do you see the future of film distribution heading?
I am absolutely positive that the future of independent film distribution is not in the traditional ways as it was up to now. Releasing a film theatrically or even via broadcast has great costs associated with it and considering the budgets filmmakers can make movies for these days, it makes absolutely no sense to waste all that money on traditional distribution. Filmmakers can keep all the rights to their movies while releasing them online for free or with minimal costs attached. This is the future for all film, and I think, given YouTube's already-established audience, this can be the next step for how the platform can be used. Other sites that are strictly focusing on the filmmaking community, like, for example IndieProducer.net, will embrace this movie, because lots of us filmmakers are already online and lots of us hunger to see each other's films. We just need a place where we can go and see a good film.

6. What is your favorite aspect of filmmaking?
Editing! Editing and post-production is definitely my favorite part. Because that's when you are done with all the stress; you know what you filmed and what kind of personalities you have. When I sit down in front of my Avid and watch the hours and hours of footage I have, that's when I feel I finally have made a movie. That's when the story comes all together for me.




Guide to making the most out of SXSW

, , , ,

| 9 comments

Howcast is out on the streets of Austin, TX, asking creative types at SXSW how to make the most of the festival, which can be an important place for filmmakers and musicians to network and find an audience for their work.



- Don't be shy. Make a lot of friends. You never know when your paths will cross again
- Try to see other people's films (or music showcases)
- Be prepared to talk about your art at any time
- Charge your phone whenever you can
- Eat! Take advantage of the free food
- Get on as many guest lists as possible
- Don't drink too much, because it is a marathon and not a sprint

Read more in the Howcast blog.




An Animated Conversation with Joaquin Baldwin

, , , , ,

| 69 comments

Creating any animation is an impressive feat: it requires artistic skill, patience and a vivid imagination. Creating animations that receive hundreds of awards and millions of views on YouTube: that's just downright next level. In this conversation, Joaquin Baldwin, the animator behind "Sebastian's Voodoo" and "Papiroflexia," discusses his techniques, the inspiration behind his very different films, and his thoughts on online distribution.

Can you talk a bit about using YouTube and the Screening Room as a distribution platform?
I put my films on YouTube as soon as they were finished, and I've gotten more views here than in all the hundreds of film festivals my films have played at combined. If what you are looking for is to get a large amount of people to see your work, it is definitely the right approach. The Screening Room was a big push on the views, too -- having my films as featured content brought a whole new audience and a lot of subscribers to me. Nowadays, as soon as I publish something, I get a large amount of subscribers who automatically see it so it brings an immediate response.

A word of advice: If you consider your film to be good enough to qualify for an Academy Award, wait a bit longer before you publish it online. Both "Papiroflexia" and "Sebastian's Voodoo" were online way too early, and they both qualified for Academy Award consideration after winning some select festivals, but because they were already online I lost my chance.

What made you want to get into animation?
Being a computer nerd was the start of it all, and loving to draw. I first got into computer animation, more as special effects and fun graphics to play with, while I was in high school. It wasn't until I was working on my undergraduate degree that I saw its real potential as a storytelling tool. That's when I really started pushing more towards creating full films rather than just cool graphics.

Where do you get the inspiration for your films?
I get a lot of inspiration from poetry, very visual metaphors or concepts. Usually my films start with a simple idea or image, and then evolve into a narrative trying to keep that main idea in mind the whole time. I also watch a lot of films, both animated and live action, and directors like Guillermo del Toro or Hayao Miyazaki  are very important sources of inspiration.

Can you tell us a bit about your animation process? How long does a film typically take?
It greatly depends on the film, so let me give you two examples:


Papiroflexia: It took me 8 months of work. It's a 2D film with a lot of motion graphics in it, but the main animation was all created with pencil and animation paper on a light table, then cleaned-up with ink, and scanned and colored in the computer. I used a variety of software, from MonkeyJam for quick animation tests with my webcam, to Animo for quick coloring, to After Effects to put it all together.

Sebastian's Voodoo: It took 10 months of work. It's a 3D film, completely created in Maya and After Effects (with textures painted in Photoshop). I went through the traditional pipeline for CG, from storyboards to modeling, texturing, rigging, animatic, animation, lighting, rendering and finally compositing.

One important part on any of my films is that I spend a LOT of time working on a storyboard before I start animating. The storyboards go through a lot of revisions before they are ready; I try to show them to as many people as possible to get a good idea if they are working or not before I settle into anything.

What would be your advice for someone who's trying to create their first computer-generated animation?
There's a lot of help you can find online, for whichever software you are using, and a ton of tutorials on traditional animation and drawing as well. You should definitely try some traditional animation (not necessarily with pencil and paper, just draw with a tablet on your computer if you want), and get a feel on how the basics of animation work. It'll help with your CG work immensely. Draw a lot!

Where do you see the future of animation going?
There's too many people concerned about Avatar, both animators and actors. I say bring it on; it's fantastic to have all of this new technology available, it will not replace actors or animators, each have their own strengths and work for different situations. And soon all of this new technology will be available for everyone, it's amazing that anyone can do an animated film nowadays, with even the most basic computer. I'm sure soon enough we'll be able to do our own performance capture at home with a webcam ;)




Howcast Seeking YouTube Filmmakers at SXSW

, ,

| 21 comments

Howcast, those folks who hosted that great roundtable discussion with four young innovative filmmakers for Creator's Corner, will be at SXSW in full force, looking for filmmakers to talk to and put on camera. They're especially interested in knowing about "what you make and how you make it." So if you're in Austin next week, seek them out to talk shop; if you're not, stay tuned to this blog for a recap of all the filmmaking tips and nuggets picked up at the festival.

For more details, check out the Howcast blog.




Weekend Project: Oscar Parodies

, ,

| 24 comments

The 82nd annual Academy Awards are just one week away (Sunday, March 7) and this year there are twice as many nominees (10!) for Best Picture.

We'd like to highlight some of the funniest parodies of this year's Best Picture contenders; some examples are below. So if you've got some time this weekend, try your hand at one of these, then tag your video with "ytoscarparody" so we can find it on Oscar Day.








It's Not SciFi, It's YouTube: Ataque de Panico's Federico Alvarez Mattos

, ,

| 22 comments

Uruguayan filmmaker Federico Alvarez Mattos recently made headlines when his special-effects-laden YouTube video, "Ataque de Panico (Panic Attack!) 2009," caught the eye of Hollywood bigwigs, who offered him $30 million to bring his talents to the large screen under the tutelage of director Sam Raimi (Spider-Man). Our Mexico-based communications manager Ricardo Blanco interviewed Mattos and put together this short piece about his incredible journey:

"Since age 8, I was a director. I got a cheap camera from my father and the first things that we filmed were special effects, made with Playmobil [small plastic figurines]," says Mattos, who is gradually uploading all his old videos to his YouTube channel. The filmmaker has come a long way from those days of toy-centric movies; now, in his short "Panic Attack!," he leads the inhabitants of Montevideo into a terrible future dominated by an invasion of massive robots.

For Mattos, the short is "an attempt to bring Hollywood to your neighborhood fantasy...to your country." The idea of giant robots invading a city other than "the usual" Los Angeles or New York came to him when he was a graduate student in screenwriting in Amsterdam. He thought it might be impressive for people to see Montevideo immersed in a science fiction environment.

Achieving this was not easy. Mattos started filming the short in 2006, but then he put it on hold, as he didn't have the required software to complete it. "We were missing the plug-ins needed; the ones available were very sophisticated tools, complex and slow," he recalls.

He resumed the project in late 2008, working on it for roughly 8 hours a day over 6 months. It cost $500 to make, and he uploaded it to YouTube on November 3, 2009.

Now it has over 1 million views and Mattos has the attention (and funding) of Hollywood. How did this happen?

"Beyond that you like the story or the effects, there is something indisputable: the film was seen by half a million people in two weeks. Motionographer.com blogged it the day it went up [and it went from there]," says Mattos.

Now he's been asked to direct "a sci-fi movie about an alien invasion" but cannot reveal more about the project. But we have to ask: Will there be robots?

"I don't think there will be," Mattos laughs. "I'm a little tired of them."




Ask a Ninja Co-Creator on 10 Years of Digital Filmmakering

, , , , , , ,

| 11 comments

Kent Nichols, the co-creator, director and producer of AskANinja.com (aka digitalfilmmaker on YouTube), recently celebrated 10 years as a Web auteur. Here are his thoughts on reaching that milestone and the technology he's employed along the way, reprinted with permission from his blog. (If you want to see the original post, click here.)

Writing this and not coming off as a grumpy old man is tough. But we truly are living in the most exciting time ever to be a filmmaker. I am approaching the 10th Anniversary of my leaving college to become a professional storyteller, and in that time we have seen such an amazing growth in the capabilities of the tools and an intensification of the competition. It’s almost unthinkable where we will be in the next ten years.

When I started editing movies I used the first iMac with Firewire and the first version of the iMovie. The 1.0 of iMovie didn’t even have an “undo” feature. I had to save a lot and revert back. I was so excited when 2.0 came out and there was an undo. Render times for DV were atrocious and hard drive space was scarce (you couldn’t even fit a whole DV tape onto one drive).

Now most laptops can churn out DV, and Harddrives are spacious. Render times and space still get eaten up by HiDef, but that will change and soon we’ll all be working in 4k…

Back then I bought a Sony TRV-900 for $1800. It cost as much as my car at the time. It was a 3-CCD 1/4 Camcorder that recorded to Mini-DV tapes in Standard Definition. Feature films were shot on this camera, films that made it into festivals, and into the theaters.

Now I bought a Canon 7D SLR that shoots beautiful stills and video for that same $1800. It has an imager that’s as larger as Super 35mm film and shoots in High Definition with replaceable lenses.

Back in 2000, my friends at the comedy schools I attended and where I met Douglas Sarine, no one was thinking about putting their stuff on the internet. I was showing them films like 405, Hard Drinking Lincoln, and others to get them excited.

Now I go to parties that have 500 people all with their own web show. All seeking funding, all looking to be the next Ask A Ninja or LonelyGirl15 (and some of them not knowing what Ask A Ninja and LonelyGirl15 are…).

So in summary, in terms of tools, now has never been a better or more exciting time. If you can’t mange to get your vision realized with whatever level of tools you have available to you, you lack imagination. Every Mac for the last ten years can edit video there is a new or used one available at your price point. Most stills cameras from the last 3 years can shoot video, as well as most cells phones, and then there are the amazing and high quality HD camcorders too. The tools are there, go tell a story.

In terms of competing for scarce resources, now is probably the most daunting time. Anyone can be a producer and director, and you’re only going to stand out if you’re talented and lucky and persistent. LA is a great place, but it’s also a place where there will be thousands of other just like you. If you stay where you’re from and become undeniably good you’ll eventually get here.

I had no choice, I grew up in Southern California, but it’s very expensive and isolating without a family (and that “family” can be a close-knit group of friends too, but those are very hard to find in LA…).

Go tell your stories, and keep getting better at telling them. And always remember to care more, that will get communicated to your audience.




DIY Film Distribution: A Case Study

, , ,

| 24 comments



In this video, the filmmakers behind "Four Eyed Monsters" reveal how they used YouTube, community and the web to erase their credit card debt and get their labor of love into theaters. If you don't have time to watch the whole video (it's 29 minutes long), here are some of the key takeaways:

1. Start simple. Arin Crumley and Susan Buice shot their film from a one-page outline, a crude storyboard, and with small cameras and a small crew.

2. Tell the story behind your story. When they couldn't find a distributor for their film, they decided to do daily video blogs to reinforce their creative talents and build an audience. A result was that people started to feel like they knew the filmmakers firsthand; that, in turn, fueled curiosity about them and their work, and eventually put people in theaters.

3. Involve your audience, part A. The filmmakers actively sought out feedback from their fans via platforms like YouTube and MySpace, and took the advice seriously. It impacted new episodes of the podcasts and the film itself, which they were still editing. In other words, the audience actually shaped the final product.

4. Involve your audience, part B. When determining where to distribute their film, the couple went to regions where they knew they already had fans, thanks to emails and zip codes they had collected from their podcast and other marketing activities. They also created a "heart map" so that people could see the requests for the film to play in their town grow and who was going -- a social network of sorts.

5. Network in the real world, too. Film festivals used to be about getting a film acquired by a distributor or a short into the hands of a talent agent. But Crumley and Buice went to hundreds of festivals around the world and thought strategically about whom they encountered. When they met the guys at Spout, they realized that Spout needed publicity and users. 4EM had those two things, but needed money. It turned out to be a fruitful (and fateful) match.