4 Conversations with Filmmakers from the 2010 Tribeca Film Festival
What was the inspiration for your film?
Brian Hill, director of Climate of Change
The inspiration for the film was a desire to move on from the kind of environmental films that had showcased the science of climate change and the perilous state the earth was in. I’d seen and very much liked An Inconvenient Truth but felt that there was room for a film in which we heard from ordinary people around the world who were concerned about environmental matters and felt that they could offer something. So in a sense the inspiration for the film was the belief that all of us can make a difference.
I always loved high school movies... and Leon Trotsky. My parents sent me to therapy to cure one of those things. It didn't work.
The Infidel, about a Muslim who finds out he was born a Jew, was inspired by a number of things - not least David Baddiel's (the writer's) experiences growing up. Of Jewish origin, he was beaten up on two spearate occassions: once for being thought Jewish, once for being thought Pakistani. Then there was Omid Djalili and his stand up - the first of the "2nd generation" standups to really mine the prejudices and presumptions of the post cold-war identity politics - east vs west, Muslim vs Christian, middle east vs Jewish and what have you - in an inclusive and enabling way. There's something very warm and non-misanthropic about his humour and that was a necessity for our subject matter. I too have a mixed background, actually a transatlantic one, hence an American Richard Schiff's character as the Jewish "buddy". I loved the idea of colliding of a kind of 80s body-swap high-concept comedy idea with the most vexed politics of our era... There's low-status British comedy combining with American indie and screwball lineages, so with the form as well as the content I wanted to bring together different cultures.
Mat Whitecross, director of sex & drugs & rock & roll
The inspiration for the film came from Ian Dury's life and from his music - his family and friends were instrumental in communicating that to us. On top of that, we unearthed a huge amount of period research in the form of interviews and documentaries - and YouTube clips of Ian's performances and interviews were instrumental in me deciding to come on board the project at the start. Aside from that, there were a few films that we drew on - not directly - but that we could talk about as general influences; above all 8 1/2 and All That Jazz.
I don’t think I ever consciously thought that much about a distribution strategy. What I did think about was how a film about the environment might impact people and draw in an audience and I thought that the best way to do that was to concentrate on the ordinary and everyday experiences of people. So in terms of the creative process I wanted the film to be simple in structure and feature great characters. And I was also, right from the start, determined to make a film that looked and sounded great.
Beyond securing Canadian distribution (which we need to get financing), all I really wanted was to make the best movie I could. I figured that would give me the best chance of getting my film seen.
We had to consider distribution from the start because even with a small indie movie in the UK you can't get finance up front if you don't have a distributor. From the start there was a lot of distrust of whether the idea would work comedically or whether it would cause too much controversy, yet on the other hand there was great demand for the idea, from international pre-sales and just people responding to the script. You have to walk a line between something that's too cartoony, that has no teeth whatsoever, and something that is inclusive rather than exclusive or alienating, a kind of humor that is non-misanthropic rather than setting out to offend. Within that gentleness, we looked at the comic stereotypes we were using and tried extra hard to subvert them. And actually the most subversive thing is perhaps simply presenting a family who happen to be Muslim but are essentially everymen, everypeople. The son doesn't become a suicide bomber, the dad doesn't become a fundamentalist, they're just an ordinary rather flawed family, vaguely religious but not in any thought-out or political way. Muslim and Asian audiences have really embraced that - the normality of that. We always talked about creating a "muslim Homer Simpson."
I was fortunate to have an incredible studio, Studio 18, support me on this journey. They loved the script and believed in the film. I also had the most incredible sales company - Fortissimo come early on board. The screenplay was an official selection at Cannes in their Atelier du Cannes section. So the filming process was a relaxed one. But getting US distribution was a distant dream. When we heard about Tribeca Film taking my film - it was like that moment with the travelling cinema! It’s a historic moment for us- it’s been a long-long time since an Indian independent films has got US distribution.
We intentionally financed the film’s budget out of the UK as initially the subject matter seemed to exclude international monies. Once film was complete and our UK release was underway, we obviously wanted to maximize its appeal globally and believe we had a universal story that was not dependent on any prior knowledge of the man or his music, focusing o the father / son relationships in the film. This had indeed been an early creative decision for the film to reach a wider audience, otherwise we might as well have made a niche documentary.
Climate of Change was actually rejected from a number of festivals before being accepted at Tribeca. I think that’s because there is a certain kind of film that is seen as a “festival film,” a film that people in the industry like and want to promote. What was great about Tribeca was a recognition that festivals can become inward looking and solipsistic and that to be really effective they should broaden their remit and attract a wider audience than industry professionals. In other words, take the films to regular people. So my advice would be to choose your festivals carefully.
There's not a lot to say about applying to festivals. Make sure you apply to the biggest and brightest first, because you don't want to end up premiering at a little festival, and have your film deemed ineligible to go to a major (festivals are getting more and more political, and more and more obsessed with "premieres").
Submit widely and don't take the knock-backs personally!
It's easy to be tempted by the big names. They are seductive and cool to be a part of. But one runs the risk of getting lost. I’d suggest looking at the smaller ones, the specialist ones. That’s where my first film was discovered. Your first public screening is a special moment and a nerve wracking one too. So choose a festival where your film will be cared for, loved by the team, understood and given the right platform to be seen and your voice as a filmmaker heard.
Look at deadline applications and time the completion of your film to the most realistic both in one’s own domestic territory and in foreign markets. Look at criteria as festivals are strict on length.
I learned that there is an appetite for documentary and that people want to watch films that don’t preach to them or patronize them. My best experience at Tribeca was a screening we had for 500 New York schoolchildren. They were enthusiastic and receptive and it made me realize that you can’t second guess an audience, you can’t really say for certain who will like your film or why they will like it.
That New Yorkers want more socialism!
Putting comedy in front of an audience is more brutal than any other genre: you know when it's working, and when it's not. I was curious to see how it would go down with a US audience - the cultural specificity of some of the gags - the different weighting of the terms Muslim and Jew here for example is a little different - but more importantly the overall sense of whether it entertains. The film mines a vein of humour which you could call American Jewish - hence Richard Schiff's character - and New York is a city that better than any other understands both the anxiety and the comedy that comes from groups of immigrants clashing. So I had high hopes. And if anything, the festival audience enjoyed it more whole heartedly than at home. Perhaps New Yorkers are just less repressed than Londoners.
It’s the best film school I could ever go to. The Tribeca audience taught me stuff no film could ever. It was like being in a Directing Master Class. Story, Story, Story. Pacing, Rhythm, Performance, Subtlety, Directness, the list is endless. That’s what I learned. The things that worked in my story and the bits that did not. What I could have done and what I should be doing for my next one.
We were 50% excited, 50% terrified about showing the film at Tribeca. Would people know about Ian's life? If not, did it matter? In the event, we had a fantastic mix of die-hard Blockhead fanatics, and new recruits to the cause. All of them embraced the film enthusiastically, which was such a relief. There's nothing like an NY audience to tell you what they really think of your film.
I think independent cinema will be healthy in five years from now as long as it moves with the times and embraces new ways of reaching people. In that respect, Tribeca is way ahead of the game compared with other festivals.
In 3-D. And blue.
I don't think anyone knows. The fear is that between 3D tentpoles in the studio system and internet piracy and alternate entertainments the indie sector will just be squeezed nearly out of existence. We'll see. I think there'll always be cineastes and creators who'll struggle to see their visions realised in this incredibly powerful medium; the question is how far they'll be able to go with what remains, despite the supposed benefits of 'digital', a very expensive medium. I wonder to what extent broadcasters and public service could come to play more of a role again. I'll be keeping my eyes open...
In five years, Indie cinema will have swamped everything else. Look at it now- in terms of numbers I think it beats everything else. I’m a never say die person. I don’t see the independent spirit disappearing - EVER. In fact,You Tube and other online forums are the new screens where new voices are born by the hour. There’s such incredible work being created here it’s jaw dropping. A few years ago no one would have ever imagined that something like this would exist.
